Evaluation CRITERIA

Before been accepted or rejected for the conference program, ICTERI submissions are evaluated by the members of the Program Committee. The criteria used by the Program Committee members depend on paper types as explained below.

  1. Full research papers (12-16 LNCS pages)
  • Report on accomplished, unpublished research work
  • Present a novel method, technique or analysis with appropriate empirical or other evaluation as proof of validity

Evaluation focuses on originality, technical soundness and the soundness of the real-use demonstration.

  1. Short research papers (10-12 LNCS pages)
  • Short reports of preliminary results or work-in-progress

Evaluation focuses on originality, technical correctness and the value of the planned results in a short to mid-term perspective.

III. Industry/Education experience papers (12-16 LNCS pages)

  • Report on industrial or academic deployments of novel ICT
  • Experiences in the effective/efficient use of novel ICT in education

Evaluation focuses on the significance and practical relevance, technical soundness, and accompanying evaluation or industrial validation.

  1. Poster Papers (10-12 LNCS pages)
  • Concisely present early-stage research in the form of a Short Paper. These papers outline preliminary ideas, concepts, and initial results shaping future work. Posters will be presented in a separate poster session.

Evaluation focuses on originality, technical correctness, the value of the research ideas, and the potential to become a mature research outcome in a short-to-mid-term perspective.