Before been accepted or rejected for the conference program, ICTERI submissions are evaluated by the members of the Program Committee. The criteria used by the Program Committee members depend on paper types as explained below.
Regular (Full) Research Papers
The papers in this category are the reports on the accomplished research work. They present a novel method, technique or analysis with appropriate empirical or other type of evaluation as a proof of validity.
- Evaluation criteria: originality, technical soundness, soundness of the real use demonstration
- Page limit: 16 CCIS pages
Short Research Papers and Extended Abstracts
The papers in this category are the short reports of the preliminary results or describing the work in progress.
- Evaluation criteria: originality, technical correctness, and potential value of the planned results in a short to mid-term perspective
- Page limit: 8 CCIS pages for short papers; 4 CCIS pages for extended abstracts
Discussion, Survey, or Problem Analysis Papers
The papers in this category will help understand a relevant problem and also a method, technique or approach to solving the problem, though without contributing a novel method, technique or approach. A paper in this category may include a reasonable review placing the addressed problem onto the state-of-the-art landscape and analyzing how far current solutions fall short. Clear definitions and argumentation are also expected in terms of qualitative or quantitative representation of the main characteristics of the problem.
- Evaluation criteria: the soundness of the problem analysis and the interest for the scientific community
- Page limit: 16 CCIS pages
Industry Experience Reports or Case Studies
The papers in this category report on industrial deployments of ICT.
- Evaluation criteria: significance and practical relevance, technical soundness, and accompanying evaluation or industrial validation
- Page limit: 12 CCIS pages